Understanding the Sinhala Government: History, Politics, and Structure

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the political landscape in Sri Lanka, focusing on the role of the Sinhalese majority in shaping national policies, particularly in relation to the Tamil Eelam struggle. By examining the historical context, ideological shifts, and power structures within Sri Lankan society, the article explores the dynamics that have contributed to the marginalization of the Tamil community and the perpetuation of Sinhala-majority dominance. It delves into the positions of right-wing and left-wing Sinhalese factions, the Buddhist Maha Sangha, the media, intellectuals, and the military, offering a thorough understanding of the forces that continue to influence the Tamil Eelam struggle and the broader socio-political climate in Sri Lanka.

Introduction:

The Sri Lankan political landscape has been profoundly shaped by the Sinhalese majority and their dominant role in governance. Central to this landscape is the Tamil Eelam struggle, a fight for Tamil self-determination that has persisted for decades. This article seeks to analyze the various political factions within Sri Lanka, with a particular focus on the different factions within the Sinhalese community and their positions regarding the Tamil Eelam struggle. The primary factions include:

1. Right-wing Sinhalese

2. Left-wing Sinhalese

3. Buddhist Maha Sangha

4. Media and Sinhalese Intellectuals

5. The Military

Each of these factions has played a critical role in shaping Sri Lanka’s political climate, often to the detriment of the Tamil community, whose rights have frequently been marginalized. The influence of these factions persists in the present day, influencing both domestic policies and international perceptions of Sri Lanka’s human rights record.

1. Right-wing Sinhalese:

The right-wing Sinhalese faction in Sri Lanka can be further divided into two key subgroups: Kandyan Sinhalese and Coastal Sinhalese. The Kandyan Sinhalese are more conservative, emphasizing the preservation of traditional caste systems and cultural practices, while the Coastal Sinhalese have historically been more politically engaged, particularly due to their exposure to colonial influences, including Christianity. These groups have been instrumental in consolidating Sinhalese political dominance through various means, often at the expense of Tamil political and cultural rights.

In the present political climate, right-wing Sinhalese factions are embodied in parties such as the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), which has been led by figures like Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Mahinda Rajapaksa. These factions continue to align themselves with Sinhala-Buddhist nationalism, a position that directly challenges Tamil demands for autonomy. Despite international calls for reconciliation, the policies of the SLPP have maintained Sinhalese political dominance, exacerbating ethnic tensions.

2. Left-wing Sinhalese:

The left-wing Sinhalese initially emerged with a focus on human rights and welfare, particularly for oppressed groups and the working class. Their early ideologies were shaped by humanism and compassion. However, the shift in global geopolitics during and after World War II led to ideological fragmentation within the Sinhalese left-wing. Internal divisions—particularly the alignment of certain factions with anti-India sentiment—resulted in a movement that began to view the Tamil Eelam struggle as a foreign-backed separatist movement.

Prominent figures like Philip Gunawardena, Bandaranayaka played a pivotal role in shifting the left-wing’s stance toward a Sinhalese-majority framework, especially with the advent of Sinhalese-only policies in the 1950s. Over time, key left-wing leaders, including Anura Dissanayake, the son of Philip Gunawardena, moved toward right-wing ideologies, further distancing themselves from Tamil self-determination. This ideological shift culminated in the abandonment of Tamil political rights, even as the left-wing continued to critique India’s involvement in the Tamil struggle.

The current opposition parties such as Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) are still grappling with their position on Tamil autonomy, and the influence of nationalist sentiment within these factions remains a significant obstacle to the Tamil cause. Understanding these divisions within the left-wing is crucial for comprehending the broader political dynamic in Sri Lanka today.

3. Buddhist Maha Sangha:

The Buddhist Maha Sangha has been an influential force in shaping Sri Lankan national identity. The ideology of Dhamma Deepa—which positions Sri Lanka as the exclusive homeland of the Sinhalese—has been firmly endorsed by the Buddhist clergy. According to this ideology, Sinhalese is the only legitimate language of Sri Lanka, and Buddhists are seen as the rightful inhabitants of the island. This worldview has been instrumental in framing Sri Lanka as a Sinhala-Buddhist state, often at the expense of Tamil-speaking populations.

The Buddhist Maha Sangha’s influence remains strong, particularly within government policy, and has been a key source of legitimacy for military actions against Tamil civilians during the civil war and in its aftermath. Figures within groups such as the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) continue to propagate this Sinhala-Buddhist nationalist rhetoric, justifying military actions against Tamil communities and rejecting Tamil autonomy.

4. Media and Sinhalese Intellectuals:

The role of Sinhalese media and intellectuals in shaping public opinion cannot be understated. During the civil war and its aftermath, the media frequently framed the Tamil Eelam struggle as a foreign-backed separatist movement and portrayed Tamil demands for self-determination as threats to national unity. The portrayal of Tamil activists as terrorists or foreign agents continues to dominate many mainstream media outlets, contributing to the stigmatization of the Tamil cause.

Additionally, Sinhalese intellectuals have played a critical role in suppressing Tamil narratives by aligning themselves with the government’s position and downplaying the scale of human rights violations committed against Tamil civilians. Their works often validate state policies that marginalize the Tamil community, further entrenching the Sinhala-majority political stance.

In the contemporary context, state-controlled media continues to suppress Tamil voices, presenting an incomplete and biased narrative of Sri Lanka’s history. The digital media landscape, however, has provided a platform for Tamil diaspora communities to counter these narratives and advocate for Tamil rights on the international stage.

5. The Military:

The Sri Lankan military has been a key instrument in the implementation of state policies, particularly those aimed at suppressing Tamil self-determination. The military’s involvement in war crimes during the final stages of the civil war—including massacres, disappearances, and the destruction of Tamil areas—has cemented its role as an enforcer of state-led violence against the Tamil community.

The continued militarization of Tamil-majority regions, particularly in the Northern and Eastern provinces, remains a significant issue. The military’s involvement in post-war reconstruction efforts has been controversial, with accusations of land-grabbing and military occupation hindering the region’s recovery and reconciliation process. These actions continue to perpetuate ethnic tensions, as the military remains a symbol of oppression for many Tamils.

Conclusion:

The political landscape in Sri Lanka is deeply influenced by the Sinhalese majority, whose factions—both right-wing and left-wing—have shaped policies that often marginalize the Tamil community. While the left-wing Sinhalese originally championed human rights and social justice, the ideological shift toward nationalism and anti-India sentiment has undermined Tamil self-determination efforts. Similarly, the Buddhist Maha Sangha, Sinhalese media, and the military have continued to propagate a narrative that positions Sri Lanka as a Sinhala-Buddhist state, further sidelining Tamil political rights.

The Tamil Eelam struggle must move beyond fragmented political strategies and opportunistic alliances. A unified political platform that clearly advocates for the Tamil community’s right to self-determination and historical justice is essential. Moreover, international advocacy remains a key element in advancing the Tamil cause, and global pressure on Sri Lanka to address war crimes and human rights abuses must be sustained.

As the political situation in Sri Lanka continues to evolve, the Tamil community must remain steadfast in its demands for justice and reconciliation, pushing forward a coherent and disciplined political strategy both domestically and internationally. The time to act is now—Tamil rights must be secured through sustained, strategic efforts, not through opportunistic or fragmented alliances.

References:

1. Sri Lankan Hansards

2. Sri Lankan Constitution 1978

3. Mahavamsam 2018, 6th edition

4. Human Rights Reports Sri Lanka, UNHCR

5. Professor Mu Thirunavukkarasu (Ilankaiyin Arasiyal Yaappu)

6. Donamoor Thodakkam Sirisena Varai Mu Thoruvukkarasu book

7. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International Reports on Sri Lanka’s post-war situation.

Nila Bala (Balananthini Balasubramaniam)

United Kingdom

09:30

21 - Mar - 2025

******************************************************************